Add infra to block ChannelMonitorUpdates on forwarded claims

When we forward a payment and receive an `update_fulfill_htlc`
message from the downstream channel, we immediately claim the HTLC
on the upstream channel, before even doing a `commitment_signed`
dance on the downstream channel. This implies that our
`ChannelMonitorUpdate`s "go out" in the right order - first we
ensure we'll get our money by writing the preimage down, then we
write the update that resolves giving money on the downstream node.

This is safe as long as `ChannelMonitorUpdate`s complete in the
order in which they are generated, but of course looking forward we
want to support asynchronous updates, which may complete in any
order.

Here we add infrastructure to handle downstream
`ChannelMonitorUpdate`s which are blocked on an upstream
preimage-containing one. We don't yet actually do the blocking which
will come in a future commit.

Author: TheBlueMatt

lightning/src/ln/channelmanager.rs

@@ -504,12 +504,24 @@ pub(crate) enum MonitorUpdateCompletionAction {
 	/// event can be generated.
 	PaymentClaimed { payment_hash: PaymentHash },
 	/// Indicates an [`events::Event`] should be surfaced to the user.
-	EmitEvent { event: events::Event },
+	EmitEventAndFreeOtherChannel {
+		event: events::Event,
+		downstream_counterparty_and_funding_outpoint: Option<(PublicKey, OutPoint, RAAMonitorUpdateBlockingAction)>,
+	},
 }
 
 impl_writeable_tlv_based_enum_upgradable!(MonitorUpdateCompletionAction,
 	(0, PaymentClaimed) => { (0, payment_hash, required) },
-	(2, EmitEvent) => { (0, event, upgradable_required) },
+	(2, EmitEventAndFreeOtherChannel) => {
+		(0, event, upgradable_required),
+		// LDK prior to 0.0.115 did not have this field as the monitor update application order was
+		// required by clients. If we downgrade to something prior to 0.0.115 this may result in
+		// monitor updates which aren't properly blocked or resumed, however that's fine - we don't
+		// support async monitor updates even in LDK 0.0.115 and once we do we'll require no
+		// downgrades to prior versions. Thus, while this would break on downgrade, we don't
+		// support it even without downgrade, so if it breaks its not on us ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
+		(1, downstream_counterparty_and_funding_outpoint, option),
+	},
 );
 
 #[derive(Clone, Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
@@ -526,6 +538,29 @@ impl_writeable_tlv_based_enum!(EventCompletionAction,
 	};
 );
 
+#[derive(Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Debug)]
+pub(crate) enum RAAMonitorUpdateBlockingAction {
+	/// The inbound channel's channel_id
+	ForwardedPaymentOtherChannelClaim {
+		channel_id: [u8; 32],
+		htlc_id: u64,
+	},
+}
+
+impl RAAMonitorUpdateBlockingAction {
+	fn from_prev_hop_data(prev_hop: &HTLCPreviousHopData) -> Self {
+		Self::ForwardedPaymentOtherChannelClaim {
+			channel_id: prev_hop.outpoint.to_channel_id(),
+			htlc_id: prev_hop.htlc_id,
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+impl_writeable_tlv_based_enum!(RAAMonitorUpdateBlockingAction,
+	(0, ForwardedPaymentOtherChannelClaim) => { (0, channel_id, required), (2, htlc_id, required) }
+;);
+
+
 /// State we hold per-peer.
 pub(super) struct PeerState<Signer: ChannelSigner> {
 	/// `temporary_channel_id` or `channel_id` -> `channel`.
@@ -554,6 +589,11 @@ pub(super) struct PeerState<Signer: ChannelSigner> {
 	/// to funding appearing on-chain), the downstream `ChannelMonitor` set is required to ensure
 	/// duplicates do not occur, so such channels should fail without a monitor update completing.
 	monitor_update_blocked_actions: BTreeMap<[u8; 32], Vec<MonitorUpdateCompletionAction>>,
+	/// If another channel's [`ChannelMonitorUpdate`] needs to complete before a channel we have
+	/// with this peer can complete an RAA [`ChannelMonitorUpdate`] (e.g. because the RAA update
+	/// will remove a preimage that needs to be durably in an upstream channel first), we put an
+	/// entry here to note that the channel with the key's ID is blocked on a set of actions.
+	actions_blocking_raa_monitor_updates: BTreeMap<[u8; 32], Vec<RAAMonitorUpdateBlockingAction>>,
 	/// The peer is currently connected (i.e. we've seen a
 	/// [`ChannelMessageHandler::peer_connected`] and no corresponding
 	/// [`ChannelMessageHandler::peer_disconnected`].
@@ -4386,23 +4426,24 @@ where
 			},
 			HTLCSource::PreviousHopData(hop_data) => {
 				let prev_outpoint = hop_data.outpoint;
+				let completed_blocker = RAAMonitorUpdateBlockingAction::from_prev_hop_data(&hop_data);
 				let res = self.claim_funds_from_hop(hop_data, payment_preimage,
 					|htlc_claim_value_msat| {
 						if let Some(forwarded_htlc_value) = forwarded_htlc_value_msat {
 							let fee_earned_msat = if let Some(claimed_htlc_value) = htlc_claim_value_msat {
 								Some(claimed_htlc_value - forwarded_htlc_value)
 							} else { None };
 
-							let prev_channel_id = Some(prev_outpoint.to_channel_id());
-							let next_channel_id = Some(next_channel_id);
-
-							Some(MonitorUpdateCompletionAction::EmitEvent { event: events::Event::PaymentForwarded {
-								fee_earned_msat,
-								claim_from_onchain_tx: from_onchain,
-								prev_channel_id,
-								next_channel_id,
-								outbound_amount_forwarded_msat: forwarded_htlc_value_msat,
-							}})
+							Some(MonitorUpdateCompletionAction::EmitEventAndFreeOtherChannel {
+								event: events::Event::PaymentForwarded {
+									fee_earned_msat,
+									claim_from_onchain_tx: from_onchain,
+									prev_channel_id: Some(prev_outpoint.to_channel_id()),
+									next_channel_id: Some(next_channel_id),
+									outbound_amount_forwarded_msat: forwarded_htlc_value_msat,
+								},
+								downstream_counterparty_and_funding_outpoint: None,
+							})
 						} else { None }
 					});
 				if let Err((pk, err)) = res {
@@ -4429,8 +4470,13 @@ where
 						}, None));
 					}
 				},
-				MonitorUpdateCompletionAction::EmitEvent { event } => {
+				MonitorUpdateCompletionAction::EmitEventAndFreeOtherChannel {
+					event, downstream_counterparty_and_funding_outpoint
+				} => {
 					self.pending_events.lock().unwrap().push_back((event, None));
+					if let Some((node_id, funding_outpoint, blocker)) = downstream_counterparty_and_funding_outpoint {
+						self.handle_monitor_update_release(node_id, funding_outpoint, Some(blocker));
+					}
 				},
 			}
 		}
@@ -5277,6 +5323,36 @@ where
 		}
 	}
 
+	fn raa_monitor_updates_held(&self,
+		actions_blocking_raa_monitor_updates: &BTreeMap<[u8; 32], Vec<RAAMonitorUpdateBlockingAction>>,
+		channel_funding_outpoint: OutPoint, counterparty_node_id: PublicKey
+	) -> bool {
+		actions_blocking_raa_monitor_updates
+			.get(&channel_funding_outpoint.to_channel_id()).map(|v| !v.is_empty()).unwrap_or(false)
+		|| self.pending_events.lock().unwrap().iter().any(|(_, action)| {
+			action == &Some(EventCompletionAction::ReleaseRAAChannelMonitorUpdate {
+				channel_funding_outpoint,
+				counterparty_node_id,
+			})
+		})
+	}
+
+	pub(crate) fn test_raa_monitor_updates_held(&self, counterparty_node_id: PublicKey,
+		channel_id: [u8; 32])
+	-> bool {
+		let per_peer_state = self.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
+		if let Some(peer_state_mtx) = per_peer_state.get(&counterparty_node_id) {
+			let mut peer_state_lck = peer_state_mtx.lock().unwrap();
+			let peer_state = &mut *peer_state_lck;
+
+			if let Some(chan) = peer_state.channel_by_id.get(&channel_id) {
+				return self.raa_monitor_updates_held(&peer_state.actions_blocking_raa_monitor_updates,
+					chan.get_funding_txo().unwrap(), counterparty_node_id);
+			}
+		}
+		false
+	}
+
 	fn internal_revoke_and_ack(&self, counterparty_node_id: &PublicKey, msg: &msgs::RevokeAndACK) -> Result<(), MsgHandleErrInternal> {
 		let (htlcs_to_fail, res) = {
 			let per_peer_state = self.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
@@ -5939,24 +6015,28 @@ where
 		self.pending_outbound_payments.clear_pending_payments()
 	}
 
-	fn handle_monitor_update_release(&self, counterparty_node_id: PublicKey, channel_funding_outpoint: OutPoint) {
+	fn handle_monitor_update_release(&self, counterparty_node_id: PublicKey, channel_funding_outpoint: OutPoint, completed_blocker: Option<RAAMonitorUpdateBlockingAction>) {
 		loop {
 			let per_peer_state = self.per_peer_state.read().unwrap();
 			if let Some(peer_state_mtx) = per_peer_state.get(&counterparty_node_id) {
 				let mut peer_state_lck = peer_state_mtx.lock().unwrap();
 				let peer_state = &mut *peer_state_lck;
-				if self.pending_events.lock().unwrap().iter()
-					.any(|(_ev, action_opt)| action_opt == &Some(EventCompletionAction::ReleaseRAAChannelMonitorUpdate {
-						channel_funding_outpoint, counterparty_node_id
-					}))
-				{
-					// Check that, while holding the peer lock, we don't have another event
-					// blocking any monitor updates for this channel. If we do, let those
-					// events be the ones that ultimately release the monitor update(s).
-					log_trace!(self.logger, "Delaying monitor unlock for channel {} as another event is pending",
+
+				if let Some(blocker) = &completed_blocker {
+					if let Some(blockers) = peer_state.actions_blocking_raa_monitor_updates
+						.get_mut(&channel_funding_outpoint.to_channel_id())
+					{
+						blockers.retain(|iter| iter != blocker);
+					}
+				}
+
+				if self.raa_monitor_updates_held(&peer_state.actions_blocking_raa_monitor_updates,
+					channel_funding_outpoint, counterparty_node_id) {
+					log_trace!(self.logger, "Delaying monitor unlock for channel {} as another channel's mon update needs to complete first",
 						log_bytes!(&channel_funding_outpoint.to_channel_id()[..]));
 					return;
 				}
+
 				if let hash_map::Entry::Occupied(mut chan) = peer_state.channel_by_id.entry(channel_funding_outpoint.to_channel_id()) {
 					debug_assert_eq!(chan.get().get_funding_txo().unwrap(), channel_funding_outpoint);
 					if let Some((monitor_update, further_update_exists)) = chan.get_mut().unblock_next_blocked_monitor_update() {
@@ -5993,7 +6073,7 @@ where
 				EventCompletionAction::ReleaseRAAChannelMonitorUpdate {
 					channel_funding_outpoint, counterparty_node_id
 				} => {
-					self.handle_monitor_update_release(counterparty_node_id, channel_funding_outpoint);
+					self.handle_monitor_update_release(counterparty_node_id, channel_funding_outpoint, None);
 				}
 			}
 		}
@@ -6644,6 +6724,7 @@ where
 						latest_features: init_msg.features.clone(),
 						pending_msg_events: Vec::new(),
 						monitor_update_blocked_actions: BTreeMap::new(),
+						actions_blocking_raa_monitor_updates: BTreeMap::new(),
 						is_connected: true,
 					}));
 				},
@@ -7770,6 +7851,7 @@ where
 				latest_features: Readable::read(reader)?,
 				pending_msg_events: Vec::new(),
 				monitor_update_blocked_actions: BTreeMap::new(),
+				actions_blocking_raa_monitor_updates: BTreeMap::new(),
 				is_connected: false,
 			};
 			per_peer_state.insert(peer_pubkey, Mutex::new(peer_state));
@@ -7852,7 +7934,7 @@ where
 		let mut probing_cookie_secret: Option<[u8; 32]> = None;
 		let mut claimable_htlc_purposes = None;
 		let mut pending_claiming_payments = Some(HashMap::new());
-		let mut monitor_update_blocked_actions_per_peer = Some(Vec::new());
+		let mut monitor_update_blocked_actions_per_peer: Option<Vec<(_, BTreeMap<_, Vec<_>>)>> = Some(Vec::new());
 		let mut events_override = None;
 		read_tlv_fields!(reader, {
 			(1, pending_outbound_payments_no_retry, option),
@@ -8156,7 +8238,21 @@ where
 		}
 
 		for (node_id, monitor_update_blocked_actions) in monitor_update_blocked_actions_per_peer.unwrap() {
-			if let Some(peer_state) = per_peer_state.get_mut(&node_id) {
+			if let Some(peer_state) = per_peer_state.get(&node_id) {
+				for (_, actions) in monitor_update_blocked_actions.iter() {
+					for action in actions.iter() {
+						if let MonitorUpdateCompletionAction::EmitEventAndFreeOtherChannel {
+							downstream_counterparty_and_funding_outpoint:
+								Some((blocked_node_id, blocked_channel_outpoint, blocking_action)), ..
+						} = action {
+							if let Some(blocked_peer_state) = per_peer_state.get(&blocked_node_id) {
+								blocked_peer_state.lock().unwrap().actions_blocking_raa_monitor_updates
+									.entry(blocked_channel_outpoint.to_channel_id())
+									.or_insert_with(Vec::new).push(blocking_action.clone());
+							}
+						}
+					}
+				}
 				peer_state.lock().unwrap().monitor_update_blocked_actions = monitor_update_blocked_actions;
 			} else {
 				log_error!(args.logger, "Got blocked actions without a per-peer-state for {}", node_id);