Skip to content

CI Integration for aarch64 #874

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
11 tasks done
dianpopa opened this issue Jan 22, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed
11 tasks done

CI Integration for aarch64 #874

dianpopa opened this issue Jan 22, 2019 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
Priority: High Indicates than an issue or pull request should be resolved ahead of issues or pull requests labelled
Milestone

Comments

@dianpopa
Copy link
Contributor

dianpopa commented Jan 22, 2019

  • Build specific tests pass
  • Functional specific tests pass
  • Performance specific tests pass
  • Security specific tests pass
  • Remove all aarch64 warnings
  • Add clippy test for aarch64 specific regions
  • Create dockerfile for x86_64 and aarch64
  • Create docker image for x86_64 and aarch64
  • Update our CI so that it runs against aarch64 instances
  • Add CI specific tests for aarch64 (if needed).
  • Remove cross compilation related code
@raduweiss raduweiss modified the milestone: ARM Support Feb 15, 2019
@raduweiss raduweiss added the Priority: High Indicates than an issue or pull request should be resolved ahead of issues or pull requests labelled label Feb 15, 2019
@andreeaflorescu
Copy link
Member

This looks more like "Adding integration tests for ARM". We should probably also add an issue for updating our CI so that we can spawn ARM instances and run our integration tests there. What do you say?

@xiaobo55x
Copy link

Hi @dianpopa @andreeaflorescu,

Are there any user manual to boot a microVM on arm64 machine. It seems that the provided manual is for x86 machine.

Regards,

Haibo

@dianpopa
Copy link
Contributor Author

dianpopa commented May 22, 2019

hi! We do not yet have documentation for booting a microVM on arm64 machine even though firecracker now has support for that. I am currently working on PRs that fix issues #867 and #1066. Once those are merged, I will start working on setting up the CI, writing documentation and assess performance.

@dianpopa
Copy link
Contributor Author

dianpopa commented Jul 1, 2020

All checks are done.

@dianpopa dianpopa closed this as completed Jul 1, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Priority: High Indicates than an issue or pull request should be resolved ahead of issues or pull requests labelled
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants