Skip to content

Commit 2a89534

Browse files
committed
net/mlx5e: Prevent deadlock while disabling aRFS
jira LE-1907 cve CVE-2024-27014 Rebuild_History Non-Buildable kernel-4.18.0-553.5.1.el8_10 commit-author Carolina Jubran <[email protected]> commit fef9657 When disabling aRFS under the `priv->state_lock`, any scheduled aRFS works are canceled using the `cancel_work_sync` function, which waits for the work to end if it has already started. However, while waiting for the work handler, the handler will try to acquire the `state_lock` which is already acquired. The worker acquires the lock to delete the rules if the state is down, which is not the worker's responsibility since disabling aRFS deletes the rules. Add an aRFS state variable, which indicates whether the aRFS is enabled and prevent adding rules when the aRFS is disabled. Kernel log: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc4_net_next_mlx5_5483eb2 #1 Tainted: G I ------------------------------------------------------ ethtool/386089 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88810f21ce68 ((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0 but task is already holding lock: ffff8884a1808cc0 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0x53/0x200 [mlx5_core] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x80/0xc90 arfs_handle_work+0x4b/0x3b0 [mlx5_core] process_one_work+0x1dc/0x4a0 worker_thread+0x1bf/0x3c0 kthread+0xd7/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x17b4/0x2c80 lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0 __flush_work+0x7a/0x4e0 __cancel_work_timer+0x131/0x1c0 arfs_del_rules+0x143/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_arfs_disable+0x1b/0x30 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0xcb/0x200 [mlx5_core] ethnl_set_channels+0x28f/0x3b0 ethnl_default_set_doit+0xec/0x240 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd0/0x120 genl_rcv_msg+0x188/0x2c0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 netlink_unicast+0x1a1/0x270 netlink_sendmsg+0x214/0x460 __sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60 __sys_sendto+0x113/0x170 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&priv->state_lock); lock((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work)); lock(&priv->state_lock); lock((work_completion)(&rule->arfs_work)); *** DEADLOCK *** 3 locks held by ethtool/386089: #0: ffffffff82ea7210 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x15/0x40 #1: ffffffff82e94c88 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ethnl_default_set_doit+0xd3/0x240 #2: ffff8884a1808cc0 (&priv->state_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0x53/0x200 [mlx5_core] stack backtrace: CPU: 15 PID: 386089 Comm: ethtool Tainted: G I 6.7.0-rc4_net_next_mlx5_5483eb2 #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4aeb02-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xa0 check_noncircular+0x144/0x160 __lock_acquire+0x17b4/0x2c80 lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0 ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0 ? save_trace+0x3e/0x360 ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0 __flush_work+0x7a/0x4e0 ? __flush_work+0x74/0x4e0 ? __lock_acquire+0xa78/0x2c80 ? lock_acquire+0xd0/0x2b0 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 __cancel_work_timer+0x131/0x1c0 ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70 arfs_del_rules+0x143/0x1e0 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_arfs_disable+0x1b/0x30 [mlx5_core] mlx5e_ethtool_set_channels+0xcb/0x200 [mlx5_core] ethnl_set_channels+0x28f/0x3b0 ethnl_default_set_doit+0xec/0x240 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit+0xd0/0x120 genl_rcv_msg+0x188/0x2c0 ? ethnl_ops_begin+0xb0/0xb0 ? genl_family_rcv_msg_dumpit+0xf0/0xf0 netlink_rcv_skb+0x54/0x100 genl_rcv+0x24/0x40 netlink_unicast+0x1a1/0x270 netlink_sendmsg+0x214/0x460 __sock_sendmsg+0x38/0x60 __sys_sendto+0x113/0x170 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x53f/0x8f0 __x64_sys_sendto+0x20/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e </TASK> Fixes: 45bf454 ("net/mlx5e: Enabling aRFS mechanism") Signed-off-by: Carolina Jubran <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> (cherry picked from commit fef9657) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Maple <[email protected]>
1 parent 6e6a50f commit 2a89534

File tree

1 file changed

+16
-11
lines changed
  • drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core

1 file changed

+16
-11
lines changed

drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_arfs.c

Lines changed: 16 additions & 11 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -45,6 +45,10 @@ struct arfs_table {
4545
struct hlist_head rules_hash[ARFS_HASH_SIZE];
4646
};
4747

48+
enum {
49+
MLX5E_ARFS_STATE_ENABLED,
50+
};
51+
4852
enum arfs_type {
4953
ARFS_IPV4_TCP,
5054
ARFS_IPV6_TCP,
@@ -59,6 +63,7 @@ struct mlx5e_arfs_tables {
5963
spinlock_t arfs_lock;
6064
int last_filter_id;
6165
struct workqueue_struct *wq;
66+
unsigned long state;
6267
};
6368

6469
struct arfs_tuple {
@@ -169,6 +174,8 @@ int mlx5e_arfs_enable(struct mlx5e_flow_steering *fs)
169174
return err;
170175
}
171176
}
177+
set_bit(MLX5E_ARFS_STATE_ENABLED, &arfs->state);
178+
172179
return 0;
173180
}
174181

@@ -448,6 +455,8 @@ static void arfs_del_rules(struct mlx5e_flow_steering *fs)
448455
int i;
449456
int j;
450457

458+
clear_bit(MLX5E_ARFS_STATE_ENABLED, &arfs->state);
459+
451460
spin_lock_bh(&arfs->arfs_lock);
452461
mlx5e_for_each_arfs_rule(rule, htmp, arfs->arfs_tables, i, j) {
453462
hlist_del_init(&rule->hlist);
@@ -615,17 +624,8 @@ static void arfs_handle_work(struct work_struct *work)
615624
struct mlx5_flow_handle *rule;
616625

617626
arfs = mlx5e_fs_get_arfs(priv->fs);
618-
mutex_lock(&priv->state_lock);
619-
if (!test_bit(MLX5E_STATE_OPENED, &priv->state)) {
620-
spin_lock_bh(&arfs->arfs_lock);
621-
hlist_del(&arfs_rule->hlist);
622-
spin_unlock_bh(&arfs->arfs_lock);
623-
624-
mutex_unlock(&priv->state_lock);
625-
kfree(arfs_rule);
626-
goto out;
627-
}
628-
mutex_unlock(&priv->state_lock);
627+
if (!test_bit(MLX5E_ARFS_STATE_ENABLED, &arfs->state))
628+
return;
629629

630630
if (!arfs_rule->rule) {
631631
rule = arfs_add_rule(priv, arfs_rule);
@@ -738,6 +738,11 @@ int mlx5e_rx_flow_steer(struct net_device *dev, const struct sk_buff *skb,
738738
return -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
739739

740740
spin_lock_bh(&arfs->arfs_lock);
741+
if (!test_bit(MLX5E_ARFS_STATE_ENABLED, &arfs->state)) {
742+
spin_unlock_bh(&arfs->arfs_lock);
743+
return -EPERM;
744+
}
745+
741746
arfs_rule = arfs_find_rule(arfs_t, &fk);
742747
if (arfs_rule) {
743748
if (arfs_rule->rxq == rxq_index) {

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)