Skip to content

jsonschema version is not constrained: jsonschema.RefResolver is deprecated as of v4.18.0 #1840

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
2 tasks done
timonviola opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
2 tasks done

Comments

@timonviola
Copy link

Description

jsonschema version is not constrained by this package and we are seeing warning in our test runs.

jsonschema 4.23.0 An implementation of JSON Schema valid

============================== warnings summary ===============================
.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/confluent_kafka/schema_registry/json_schema.py:23
.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/confluent_kafka/schema_registry/json_schema.py:23
  /Users/timon/work/kafka-log/kafka-log/.venv/lib/python3.10/site-packages/confluent_kafka/schema_registry/json_schema.py:23: DeprecationWarning: jsonschema.RefResolver is deprecated as of v4.18.0, in favor of the https://github.com/python-jsonschema/referencing library, which provides more compliant referencing behavior as well as more flexible APIs for customization. A future release will remove RefResolver. Please file a feature request (on referencing) if you are missing an API for the kind of customization you need.
    from jsonschema import validate, ValidationError, RefResolver

How to reproduce

Create a fresh installation of the package with json extras.

Checklist

Please provide the following information:

  • confluent-kafka-python and librdkafka version (confluent_kafka.version() and confluent_kafka.libversion()):
    • confluent-kafka 2.6.0
    • confluent_kafka.libversion() ('2.3.0', 33751295)
  • Critical issue: Not a critical issue, but it will be, when jsonschema releases a new breaking change
@rayokota
Copy link
Member

Fixed by #1852

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants