Skip to content

Commit f263a81

Browse files
jrfastabborkmann
authored andcommitted
bpf: Track subprog poke descriptors correctly and fix use-after-free
Subprograms are calling map_poke_track(), but on program release there is no hook to call map_poke_untrack(). However, on program release, the aux memory (and poke descriptor table) is freed even though we still have a reference to it in the element list of the map aux data. When we run map_poke_run(), we then end up accessing free'd memory, triggering KASAN in prog_array_map_poke_run(): [...] [ 402.824689] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in prog_array_map_poke_run+0xc2/0x34e [ 402.824698] Read of size 4 at addr ffff8881905a7940 by task hubble-fgs/4337 [ 402.824705] CPU: 1 PID: 4337 Comm: hubble-fgs Tainted: G I 5.12.0+ #399 [ 402.824715] Call Trace: [ 402.824719] dump_stack+0x93/0xc2 [ 402.824727] print_address_description.constprop.0+0x1a/0x140 [ 402.824736] ? prog_array_map_poke_run+0xc2/0x34e [ 402.824740] ? prog_array_map_poke_run+0xc2/0x34e [ 402.824744] kasan_report.cold+0x7c/0xd8 [ 402.824752] ? prog_array_map_poke_run+0xc2/0x34e [ 402.824757] prog_array_map_poke_run+0xc2/0x34e [ 402.824765] bpf_fd_array_map_update_elem+0x124/0x1a0 [...] The elements concerned are walked as follows: for (i = 0; i < elem->aux->size_poke_tab; i++) { poke = &elem->aux->poke_tab[i]; [...] The access to size_poke_tab is a 4 byte read, verified by checking offsets in the KASAN dump: [ 402.825004] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff8881905a7800 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-1k of size 1024 [ 402.825008] The buggy address is located 320 bytes inside of 1024-byte region [ffff8881905a7800, ffff8881905a7c00) The pahole output of bpf_prog_aux: struct bpf_prog_aux { [...] /* --- cacheline 5 boundary (320 bytes) --- */ u32 size_poke_tab; /* 320 4 */ [...] In general, subprograms do not necessarily manage their own data structures. For example, BTF func_info and linfo are just pointers to the main program structure. This allows reference counting and cleanup to be done on the latter which simplifies their management a bit. The aux->poke_tab struct, however, did not follow this logic. The initial proposed fix for this use-after-free bug further embedded poke data tracking into the subprogram with proper reference counting. However, Daniel and Alexei questioned why we were treating these objects special; I agree, its unnecessary. The fix here removes the per subprogram poke table allocation and map tracking and instead simply points the aux->poke_tab pointer at the main programs poke table. This way, map tracking is simplified to the main program and we do not need to manage them per subprogram. This also means, bpf_prog_free_deferred(), which unwinds the program reference counting and kfrees objects, needs to ensure that we don't try to double free the poke_tab when free'ing the subprog structures. This is easily solved by NULL'ing the poke_tab pointer. The second detail is to ensure that per subprogram JIT logic only does fixups on poke_tab[] entries it owns. To do this, we add a pointer in the poke structure to point at the subprogram value so JITs can easily check while walking the poke_tab structure if the current entry belongs to the current program. The aux pointer is stable and therefore suitable for such comparison. On the jit_subprogs() error path, we omit cleaning up the poke->aux field because these are only ever referenced from the JIT side, but on error we will never make it to the JIT, so its fine to leave them dangling. Removing these pointers would complicate the error path for no reason. However, we do need to untrack all poke descriptors from the main program as otherwise they could race with the freeing of JIT memory from the subprograms. Lastly, a748c69 ("bpf: propagate poke descriptors to subprograms") had an off-by-one on the subprogram instruction index range check as it was testing 'insn_idx >= subprog_start && insn_idx <= subprog_end'. However, subprog_end is the next subprogram's start instruction. Fixes: a748c69 ("bpf: propagate poke descriptors to subprograms") Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
1 parent 1d71925 commit f263a81

File tree

4 files changed

+32
-40
lines changed

4 files changed

+32
-40
lines changed

arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c

Lines changed: 3 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -570,6 +570,9 @@ static void bpf_tail_call_direct_fixup(struct bpf_prog *prog)
570570

571571
for (i = 0; i < prog->aux->size_poke_tab; i++) {
572572
poke = &prog->aux->poke_tab[i];
573+
if (poke->aux && poke->aux != prog->aux)
574+
continue;
575+
573576
WARN_ON_ONCE(READ_ONCE(poke->tailcall_target_stable));
574577

575578
if (poke->reason != BPF_POKE_REASON_TAIL_CALL)

include/linux/bpf.h

Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -780,6 +780,7 @@ struct bpf_jit_poke_descriptor {
780780
void *tailcall_target;
781781
void *tailcall_bypass;
782782
void *bypass_addr;
783+
void *aux;
783784
union {
784785
struct {
785786
struct bpf_map *map;

kernel/bpf/core.c

Lines changed: 7 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2236,8 +2236,14 @@ static void bpf_prog_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work)
22362236
#endif
22372237
if (aux->dst_trampoline)
22382238
bpf_trampoline_put(aux->dst_trampoline);
2239-
for (i = 0; i < aux->func_cnt; i++)
2239+
for (i = 0; i < aux->func_cnt; i++) {
2240+
/* We can just unlink the subprog poke descriptor table as
2241+
* it was originally linked to the main program and is also
2242+
* released along with it.
2243+
*/
2244+
aux->func[i]->aux->poke_tab = NULL;
22402245
bpf_jit_free(aux->func[i]);
2246+
}
22412247
if (aux->func_cnt) {
22422248
kfree(aux->func);
22432249
bpf_prog_unlock_free(aux->prog);

kernel/bpf/verifier.c

Lines changed: 21 additions & 39 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -12121,33 +12121,19 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
1212112121
goto out_free;
1212212122
func[i]->is_func = 1;
1212312123
func[i]->aux->func_idx = i;
12124-
/* the btf and func_info will be freed only at prog->aux */
12124+
/* Below members will be freed only at prog->aux */
1212512125
func[i]->aux->btf = prog->aux->btf;
1212612126
func[i]->aux->func_info = prog->aux->func_info;
12127+
func[i]->aux->poke_tab = prog->aux->poke_tab;
12128+
func[i]->aux->size_poke_tab = prog->aux->size_poke_tab;
1212712129

1212812130
for (j = 0; j < prog->aux->size_poke_tab; j++) {
12129-
u32 insn_idx = prog->aux->poke_tab[j].insn_idx;
12130-
int ret;
12131+
struct bpf_jit_poke_descriptor *poke;
1213112132

12132-
if (!(insn_idx >= subprog_start &&
12133-
insn_idx <= subprog_end))
12134-
continue;
12135-
12136-
ret = bpf_jit_add_poke_descriptor(func[i],
12137-
&prog->aux->poke_tab[j]);
12138-
if (ret < 0) {
12139-
verbose(env, "adding tail call poke descriptor failed\n");
12140-
goto out_free;
12141-
}
12142-
12143-
func[i]->insnsi[insn_idx - subprog_start].imm = ret + 1;
12144-
12145-
map_ptr = func[i]->aux->poke_tab[ret].tail_call.map;
12146-
ret = map_ptr->ops->map_poke_track(map_ptr, func[i]->aux);
12147-
if (ret < 0) {
12148-
verbose(env, "tracking tail call prog failed\n");
12149-
goto out_free;
12150-
}
12133+
poke = &prog->aux->poke_tab[j];
12134+
if (poke->insn_idx < subprog_end &&
12135+
poke->insn_idx >= subprog_start)
12136+
poke->aux = func[i]->aux;
1215112137
}
1215212138

1215312139
/* Use bpf_prog_F_tag to indicate functions in stack traces.
@@ -12178,18 +12164,6 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
1217812164
cond_resched();
1217912165
}
1218012166

12181-
/* Untrack main program's aux structs so that during map_poke_run()
12182-
* we will not stumble upon the unfilled poke descriptors; each
12183-
* of the main program's poke descs got distributed across subprogs
12184-
* and got tracked onto map, so we are sure that none of them will
12185-
* be missed after the operation below
12186-
*/
12187-
for (i = 0; i < prog->aux->size_poke_tab; i++) {
12188-
map_ptr = prog->aux->poke_tab[i].tail_call.map;
12189-
12190-
map_ptr->ops->map_poke_untrack(map_ptr, prog->aux);
12191-
}
12192-
1219312167
/* at this point all bpf functions were successfully JITed
1219412168
* now populate all bpf_calls with correct addresses and
1219512169
* run last pass of JIT
@@ -12267,14 +12241,22 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
1226712241
bpf_prog_jit_attempt_done(prog);
1226812242
return 0;
1226912243
out_free:
12244+
/* We failed JIT'ing, so at this point we need to unregister poke
12245+
* descriptors from subprogs, so that kernel is not attempting to
12246+
* patch it anymore as we're freeing the subprog JIT memory.
12247+
*/
12248+
for (i = 0; i < prog->aux->size_poke_tab; i++) {
12249+
map_ptr = prog->aux->poke_tab[i].tail_call.map;
12250+
map_ptr->ops->map_poke_untrack(map_ptr, prog->aux);
12251+
}
12252+
/* At this point we're guaranteed that poke descriptors are not
12253+
* live anymore. We can just unlink its descriptor table as it's
12254+
* released with the main prog.
12255+
*/
1227012256
for (i = 0; i < env->subprog_cnt; i++) {
1227112257
if (!func[i])
1227212258
continue;
12273-
12274-
for (j = 0; j < func[i]->aux->size_poke_tab; j++) {
12275-
map_ptr = func[i]->aux->poke_tab[j].tail_call.map;
12276-
map_ptr->ops->map_poke_untrack(map_ptr, func[i]->aux);
12277-
}
12259+
func[i]->aux->poke_tab = NULL;
1227812260
bpf_jit_free(func[i]);
1227912261
}
1228012262
kfree(func);

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)