We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We change the exported types for this repo in a previous PR (I think).
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/functions-framework-nodejs/pull/347/files#r724614498
The types are declared here:
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/functions-framework-nodejs/blob/master/package.json#L10
They should probably point back to this file:
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/functions-framework-nodejs/blob/master/src/functions.ts
We should likely re-add these types, since developers would be losing type information otherwise.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I made this change intentionally. Nothing should have changed for developers because we re-export everything from functions.ts in index.ts.
functions.ts
index.ts
Sorry, something went wrong.
OK. Maybe the API extractor tool is missing some of these interfaces. I'm not quite sure. See:
#354
Fixed with #354
grant
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
We change the exported types for this repo in a previous PR (I think).
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/functions-framework-nodejs/pull/347/files#r724614498
The types are declared here:
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/functions-framework-nodejs/blob/master/package.json#L10
They should probably point back to this file:
https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/functions-framework-nodejs/blob/master/src/functions.ts
We should likely re-add these types, since developers would be losing type information otherwise.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: